I personally believe Jesus Christ was bi-sexual like many in those times. I believe he was married and had a child as well…maybe more. But just like christians, I can’t prove any of my claims and can only point to evidence that would make us believe it true. some say there is not real historical evidence for jesus. we should all decide for ourselves and we should all surly look at our own search for the facts and not just links provided by pro-religious types.

i knew a guy in school that became a nazi and at the same time found jesus…wow. I guess this is part of the belief system for this group. anyway, he too sent me all kinds of links “proving” his ideas and how “great” hitler was and how whites were the chosen race and blah..blah..blah.

peace and make sure you do a search on morton and the secret gospel of mark. read it and decide for yourself. i personally do not care what anyone believes as i personally feel jesus is just another man.

however, i also believe that it is not a sin to have sex, even if you are not married, or if you are married and want to practice sex with other partners (along as your spouse agrees), or if you want to have sex with the same gender. Nothing wrong with it. Although I do not practice any of them i would never be a person to tell them they cannot express their love just like we all have a right to express our love. religious types seem to have some problems with sex.

however, as i was growing up. 99 percent of my friends were “christians” and each and every one of them were having sex as teens out of wedlock, some had kids. all the kids that were not friends but were in church were having some kind of sex as a teen. each of them that i spoke to said they asked forgiveness and would never do it again. guess what? they did it again and it seems repeated several times. hypocrisy starts when we are kids…hard to break the habit.

I still love how you religious types “prove” your god without taking into account what the true definition of evidence and facts are and then not realizing that even if we accept your “proof” it would only prove ALL gods.

then i love how you think you have free will when even the definition of free will makes it clear that if you believe, you don’t have it as your FATE depends on your belief.

yeah, i guess all the gods before your god and all the evidence against your god aren’t convincing to those that are already brainwashed to believe but it sure works for those with a stronger mind that is not concerned about magical fates.

While Clement endorses these two passages as authentic to the secret gospel of Mark, he rejects as a Carpocratian corruption the words “naked man with naked man”. And in fact, in the supposed letter it states exactly: “After these words follows the text, “And James and John come to him,” and all that section. But “naked man with naked man,” and the other things about which you wrote, are not found.”

Plus, you leave out all references here that most consider this letter a hoax.

http://www.tertullian.org/rpearse/reviews/carlson_gospel_hoax.htm

http://www.robertmprice.mindvendor.com/art_secret.htm

http://christiancadre.blogspot.com/2005/07/is-secret-gospel-of-mark-modern.html

http://www-user.uni-bremen.de/~wie/Secret/secmark_home.html

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.music.dadl.ot/18527

You’re very good at making inflammatory statements Truelogic, not so good at making convincing inflammatory statements.